What does the ruling in US v. Glenna authorize during Terry searches?

The ruling in US v. Glenna clarifies certain procedural aspects of Terry stops, which allow law enforcement to briefly detain an individual based on reasonable suspicion in order to investigate potential criminal activity. In this context, the ruling acknowledges that officers may use handcuffs when detaining an individual, even when probable cause for an arrest has not been established. This can be necessary for officer safety and to prevent the individual from fleeing or accessing weapons during the brief detention that is permissible under Terry stops.

The use of handcuffs in this case is justified as a means to ensure safety while conducting what is typically a limited search for weapons or evidence related to an immediate concern. It's important to note that while Terry stops are limited, the use of handcuffs can be seen as a reasonable action in specific circumstances, such as if the individual poses a flight risk or a danger to the officers.

Regarding the other choices, they do not align with the legal standards set forth by the ruling in US v. Glenna, as they either misconstrue the implications of Terry stops or advocate for actions that could exceed the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.