In which case was it ruled that handcuffing a vehicle operator does not allow for a search of the passenger compartment?

In the case of State v. Sterndale, the ruling clarifies that simply handcuffing a vehicle operator does not automatically justify a search of the entire passenger compartment of the vehicle. The decision emphasizes the legal principle that the act of handcuffing does not grant law enforcement the authority to conduct searches without probable cause or specific consent. This distinction is crucial as it reinforces the protection of individuals' rights against unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment.

This case illustrates the legal boundaries surrounding vehicle searches, underscoring that officers must have a legitimate reason beyond merely securing a suspect to extend their search to areas of the vehicle where evidence or contraband might be concealed. As such, the ruling establishes important precedents regarding the conditions under which searches can be conducted in a vehicle, thereby protecting citizens' rights and ensuring law enforcement follows due process.